Recruitment of an adequate number of participants is essential for the successful completion of a clinical trial. In studies that follow participants until close-out, recruitment must be completed within a designated period of time to ensure the power of the trial is not decreased because of a diminished follow-up period. Participants who are likely to adhere to all aspects of the trial protocol should be identified and representative recruitment of both genders and all racial/ethnic minority groups is important.
Every clinical trial faces the challenge of meeting recruitment targets within a specified timeline and budget. Some trials are successful in recruiting within the original timeline and budget. However, many more have to extend the recruitment period and/or increase effort and cost. Some of the major reasons for these recruitment problems appear to be inadequate planning at all levels of the trial, overestimation of recruitment from a particular source, and inability to implement recruitment strategies rapidly if recruitment is slow. Experience has shown that database management of recruitment rates, with comprehensive monitoring is essential for successful accrual (see Participant retention and Participant withdrawal) . Clear identification of the lines of authority and designation of individual responsibilities at all levels of trial organisation are also essential (see Trial Management ).
Scenarios where special considerations apply:
Cluster randomized trials
The principles of recruitment to cluster randomized trials are the same
as those described above for patient randomized trials. Some
specific differences are:
It is useful to identify/survey all eligible clusters before the trial commences to determine whether or not there are enough clusters to achieve the desired statistical power.
Key decision makers need to be identified for each cluster.
Although new clusters can be incorporated as the trial progresses, it is common practice to identify all clusters before randomization. Randomization is then performed at a single point in time.
It is advisable to initiate the intervention as soon as possible after randomization to maximize interest and minimize possible loss to follow-up
Illustrative example - WHO Pre-eclampsia
trial
|
The women will be recruited at antenatal clinics. It
will be
emphasised that enrolment in the study is voluntary, that she can
withdraw at any time from all or part of the study, and that any
decision she takes in this respect will have no bearing on the medical
care she and her family receive. The study will be explained
verbally, according to the information sheet and consent will be
recorded with a signature or thumbprint.
|
Illustrative example - Perinatal care trial
|
CLAP coordination team will be responsible for the hospital
selection. The hospitals’ fulfillment of selection criteria will
be obtained through a survey to the Heads of the Obstetrical
Departments.
|
Illustrative example - INIS trial
|
Recruitment will depend on good teamwork, knowledge and confidence among all clinicians, particularly front line nursing and medical staff, so that parents receive appropriate information about the study before entry and throughout their baby’s stay. The ORACLE study has recruited over 11,000 infants in 161 centres. Experience from that trial suggests that it is helpful if nurses and doctors understand the study background, see clinical research as an integral part of neonatal care contributing to future quality of care, and if a named nurse is appointed and trained as a local trial co-ordinator. If those caring for the baby are well informed about the study, they can discuss it without transmitting anxiety. Indeed, parents are likely to feel less anxious if given the opportunity to discuss the options for their baby’s treatment in the context of the study with knowledgeable staff. The named nursing and medical representative in each unit will therefore receive opportunities for training, regular information and support to enable them to orientate and update new and established nursing and medical staff. The protocol, printed materials and relevant new research will be widely available and staff will be kept informed by newsletters, personal visits and the worldwide web (as in the UK Neonatal Staffing Study; www.child-health.dundee.ac.uk/research/ukneonatal-staffing/ ). More than half of all babies receive antibiotics for sepsis during their stay in a neonatal unit. Neonatal sepsis may present with subtle changes and clinicians normally have a low threshold for antibiotic treatment which should begin quickly, as infected infants can deteriorate rapidly. The threshold for IVIG therapy in this study will be greater than for antibiotics, and infants must be considered at increased risk of mortality to be eligible for IVIG. As there is evidence that nursing staff can estimate the risk of mortality as or more accurately than medical staff, it would be valuable to consult them. Once an infant is considered sufficiently ill to be eligible, it is important that enrolment takes place as soon as practically possible. All parents should routinely be given an information leaflet about INIS by the nursing staff when their baby is admitted to the neonatal unit. This will include details of their local medical and nursing contact who they can discuss the study with. If their baby becomes eligible they will be asked for consent to participate in the study and later follow up, by the most appropriate member of staff available, in person or by telephone. If they consent in person a copy of the signed consent form will be given to the parent(s). If telephone consent is considered necessary and appropriate by the recruiting clinician, a ‘Telephone consent’ form will be completed. This form should then be read and signed by the parent(s) at their next visit to the hospital. Once this has happened, a copy of the consent form will be given to the parent(s). Treatment allocation The practical arrangements for random allocation to trial groups will be as simple as possible, based on that used in the MRC ORACLE study. Staff will open the next sequentially numbered study pack kept in the neonatal unit, which contains all the materials necessary to give a course of study drug. (INIS Trial - go to protocol) |
This checklist has been modified from Pocock SJ. (1983) Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester: Page 66)
These checklists has been contributed by Barbara Farrell who prepared it for the second version of the Trial Managers Guide.
These are a selection of schedules of participants/centres
progression through the trial.
These are a selection of information sheets/leaflets that have been previously used to recruit participants.
These are a selection of newsletters that have been previously used to maintain enthusiasm and boost recruitment.
These are a selection of posters that have been previously used to
advertise the trial.
These are a selection of flyers that have been previously used to
advertise the trial.
This is a sample of a protocol summary that has been previously used in a trial.
Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:1143–56.
Lovato L, Hill K, Hertert S, Hunninghake D, Probstfield J. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Controlled Clinical Trials 1997;18:328–57.
Donner A, Klar N. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials in health research. London: Arnold, 2000.