Authors should describe each intervention thoroughly, including the “control” intervention. The characteristics of a placebo, if used, and the way in which it is to be disguised should also be reported (see blinding procedures ). It is especially important to describe thoroughly the "usual care" given to a control group or an intervention that is in fact a combination of interventions.
In some cases, a description of who administered treatments is critical because it may form part of the intervention. For example, with surgical interventions, it may be necessary to describe the number, training, and experience of surgeons in addition to the surgical procedure itself.
When relevant, authors should report details of the timing and
duration of interventions, especially if complex interventions are
given.
Illustrative example - WHO pre-eclampsia
trial
|
‘The women will be randomized to receive either a calcium supplement or a placebo from the time of enrolment, until delivery or initiation of any magnesium sulphate treatment, or the suspicion of urolithiasis. Women starting antenatal care before the twentieth week will be randomized at the first visit. Most of the women will therefore be supplemented for approximately five to six months. The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia or hypertension is not a reason for discontinuation of treatment. There will be three chewable tablets containing 500 mg elemental calcium to be taken every day. Women will be instructed to chew tablets at meals, but at least 3 hours away from any iron supplements. The control group will receive three tablets a day of identical characteristics, colour and taste as the intervention tablet prepared and packed by the same pharmaceutical manufacturer. All women will be encouraged not to take any additional calcium supplements. For those women who need analgesics, acetaminophen, and for those needing antacids, a non-calcium antacid will be recommended.’ (WHO Multicentre Randomized Trial of Calcium Supplementation for the Prevention of Pre-eclampsia - go to protocol) |
Illustrative example - Magpie trial
|
As soon as a woman has been allocated a treatment pack, the pack is opened and the trial treatment inside given as directed. Each treatment pack contains 9 x 10ml ampoules of either 50% magnesium sulphate (5g per ampoule;1g/2ml) or placebo, 1g ampoule of calcium gluconate (10ml) in case of toxicity, and an Eclampsia Rescue Pack. Participating hospitals choose whether to use the intravenous or the intramuscular route for maintenance therapy. All other aspects of care are at the discretion of the attending clinician. The safe use of magnesium sulphate relies on careful monitoring of tendon reflexes, respiratory rate and urine output. Before the trial treatment is started, the clinician checks:
If tendon reflexes are slow, respiratory rate is reduced but the woman is well oxygenated, or urine output is <25ml/hour treatment can be started, but with half the stated volume of trial treatment for each dose. If using the INTRAVENOUS route for maintenance therapy:
If using the INTRAMUSCULAR route for maintenance therapy:
Subsequent care for all women entered into the trial should be based on the assumption that they were given magnesium sulphate. (MAGPIE Trial - go to protocol) |
Illustrative example - CRASH trial
|
The study computer will then randomly assign a treatment pack number that will identify one of the CRASH treatment packs stored in the emergency department. CRASH treatment pack contains:
2g MP (or matching placebo) over 1 hour in 100mL infusion:
0.4g/hour for about 24 hours in 20mL/hour infusion (MP or matching placebo):
|
Illustrative example - Cluster trial
example: RaPP trial
|
The practical implementation of the intervention will be initiated through an educational outreach visit carried out by pharmacists recruited specifically for this purpose. The main elements of the guideline will be presented, with special emphasis on risk estimation, choice of first-line drugs, and treatment goals. A printed copy of the guideline and a one-page version will be given to the physicians, including a chart to aid the estimation of cardiovascular risk. During the visit a software package will be installed. This enables us to extract data and immediately, during the visit, present the physicians with data on their performance concerning risk estimation, choice of antihypertensive drugs and achievement of treatment goals (“audit and feed-back”). The software package also includes computerized reminders using ”pop-ups” on the computer screen. These are triggered at the patient’s first visit following a recording of an elevated blood pressure- or cholesterol-level (blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg or total-cholesterol > 5 mmol/L or LDL-cholesterol > 3mmol/L). If the patient has not been prescribed blood-pressure- or cholesterol-lowering drugs the physician is reminded of the recommendation to carry out cardiovascular risk assessment and is offered to start a computerized risk assessment tool (SmartHeart). Recommendations on choice of drugs are also given and the physician is also given the option of printing out patient information material. If the patient has been prescribed blood-pressure- or cholesterol-lowering drugs, the “pop-up” will remind the physician of recommended treatment goals and ask if the physician would like to print out patient information material. (RaPP Trial - go to protocol) |
Brighton JK et al. Specifying interventions in a clinical trial. MJA 2002; 176: 281-282. ©Copyright 2002. The Medical Journal of Australia - reproduced with permission.
This is a checklist for the description of interventions & intervention delivery developed by Dave Sackett (This checklist has been contributed by Dave Sackett, who prepared it for the forthcoming 3rd edition of Clinical Epidemiology; A Basic Science for Answering Questions about Health Care, to be published by Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins in 2005.